View all Resources

white paper

Debunking 3 Common CMMI Peer Review Myths

There’s a lot of confusion around the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and peer reviews. Should you care? Yes, and here’s why:  
 
  1. Peer reviews are an expected practice and required to achieve CMMI compliance.
  2. The way many organizations conduct these reviews wastes time and effort.
  3. Poor peer review practices and documentation may result in failure to achieve CMMI compliance.

CMMI Peer Review

This white paper provides straight talk and clear advice on what the CMMI really requires with respect to peer reviews; how to get the most value from your peer reviews; and what to look for in peer review software to improve the performance of your organization while achieving CMMI compliance. It includes three case studies that that highlight common, but costly, CMMI mistakes.

You’ll learn techniques to eliminate wasted effort while tuning your team’s performance for the greatest competitive advantage, including:

  • Three commonly held myths associated with the CMMI and peer reviews
  • CMMI key facts related to peer review requirements
  • Common peer review best practices used by CMMI mature organizations
 

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Trends in Observability Capabilities

Trends in Observability Capabilities

Get smarter about application stability  New Gatepoint research reveals why 54% of engineering leaders cite application complexity as outpacing their observability tools Engineering teams are caught between two critical demands: shipping features faster while keeping apps stable. In a recent Gatepoint Research survey of 112 executives across healthcare, financial services, retail, technology, and other industries, leaders confirmed they’re under real pressure to innovate quickly
March 24, 2026
WHITE PAPER
QA Testing Trends

QA Testing Trends

83% of QA teams are betting on AI to close the automation gap  New Gatepoint survey data from 126 executives reveals how to ship faster without losing quality. QA leaders aren’t choosing between software speed and quality. They’re expected to deliver both, simultaneously, with fewer resources. In a recent Gatepoint Research survey of 126 executives across healthcare, financial services, retail, and other regulated industries, teams confirmed they’re under enormous pressure to release faster,
March 23, 2026
WHITE PAPER
11 Best Practices for Peer Code Review

11 Best Practices for Peer Code Review

Peer code review—developers reviewing each other’s code before releasing software to QA—identifies bugs, encourages collaboration and keeps code more maintainable. Using peer code review best practices optimizes your code reviews, improves your code and makes the most of your developers’ time. But some code review techniques are inefficient and ineffective. This white paper presents 11 best practices for
November 16, 2018
WHITE PAPER