Consciously and systematically convening with one’s fellow programmers to check each other’s code for mistakes is known as peer code review, and has been repeatedly shown to accelerate and streamline the process of software development like few other practices can.
EXFO Reduces Software Development Costs While Increasing Code Review Productivity by 5X with Collaborator by SmartBear
EMC Trusts SmartBear Collaborator to Help R&D Lab Run More Efficiently
To Help Accelerate New Product Launches, Ondot Turns to SmartBear Collaborator
SmartBear Collaborator Identifies Issues Early in Development Cycle to Enable Reduction of Application Repair Costs.
When developers resist reviewing each other’s code, it increases defects, risk and costs. Creating
high-quality software requires a high-quality collaborative experience, and is crucial in the medical device industry. Unless specifically exempted in a classification regulation, any medical device
PlantCML Speeds Up Code Review Process with Collaborator
Peer code review is one of the most effective ways
to improve software quality – but is it agile? Done
correctly, it absolutely is. Yet many agile
practitioners consider peer code review to be part
of the “bad old world” of waterfall development
and reject its inclusion in agile projects
This white paper provides straight talk and clear advice on what the CMMI really requires with respect to peer reviews; how to get the most value from your peer reviews; and what to look for in peer review software to improve the performance of your organization while achieving CMMI compliance