In the best of all possible worlds, API development, testing, and operations teams always work together in perfect synchrony, delivering high-quality APIs on schedule, under budget and completely error-free. But the likelihood of achieving this ideal may seem like a mere dream to some API delivery teams. As applications become increasingly complex, consisting of multiple interdependent components and using several APIs, both internal and external, to connect them – what is the best way to strive for delivery greatness? There is a concept that can speed your time to market, reduce testing costs and reduce risk to your production API – and that’s API virtualization.

Let’s start with a simple definition; API virtualization is the process of using a tool that creates a virtual copy of your API, which mirrors all of the specifications of your production API, and using this virtual copy in place of your production API for testing. Instead of setting up a whole separate server stack to mimic production, API virtualization aims to simulate the minimum behaviors of one or more API endpoints.

To illustrate, API virtualization is the equivalent of allowing you (or, in this case, your testing team) to taste a cake – its flavor, texture, and all – before it has finished baking.

With API virtualization, your development teams can create virtual APIs instead of production APIs, enabling frequent and comprehensive testing even when the API is still in the midst of being developed. By emulating behaviors and specifications that will be present in the final production API, virtualization allows for testing much earlier in the development process, removing key bottlenecks that would otherwise delay production and time-to-market. More and more companies are using virtualization to improve productivity, reduce testing costs, and deploy higher-quality APIs in a shorter timeframe. By quickly and easily removing dependency constraints across your organization through virtualization, you can gain a competitive advantage over other companies still waiting in the linear-development limbo.

API Virtualization vs. API Mocking

API virtualization is often compared with API mocking, but they’re not the same thing. Mocks are imitation software components that are used by developers to emulate real software components for testing purposes, which initially sounds a lot like virtualization. However, one of the biggest distinctions between mocking services and virtual APIs is that mocking functions tend to be very context-specific, simulating a specific behavioral response to fulfill a certain development need at a certain time (i.e., injecting a missing dependency in order to bypass its absence, or temporarily test its presence, perhaps in isolation from the rest of the application under test).

API virtualization, on the other hand, delivers—for all development intents and testing purposes—the same behavior and functionality for any developer or tester who wants to use the API, at any time. Thus, once they’re created and exist as part of a project-wide test environment, virtual components eliminate the need for individual developers to write and rewrite their own mocks, saving time and effort for all concerned.

API Virtualization vs. Service Virtualization

Service virtualization typically refers to the process of simulating many or all components in an application stack. Traditionally, enterprise service virtualization solutions require standing up a full-stack of resources, training and management over software suites, and incur an enormous financial burden with entry costs into the hundred-thousands.

The total cost of ownership over an enterprise service virtualization solution, typically in the range of $50,000 - $200,000, includes:

  • Time identifying an appropriate solution
  • Initial Licensing costs
  • Implementation and professional services costs
  • Cost to reconfigure virtualization strategy due to project changes
  • Employee training

The magnitude of these costs can often be overwhelming for agile project teams either just getting started on implementation of a service oriented architecture (SOA) or formulating a larger enterprise API strategy. Delays in budgeting and purchasing such a costly solution prevent teams from being efficient in their projects long after the need for service virtualization is realized.

<img data-cke-saved-src="/SmartBear/media/images/Ebook%20IMG/API-Virtualization-Vs-Service-Virtualization.jpg" src="/SmartBear/media/images/Ebook%20IMG/API-Virtualization-Vs-Service-Virtualization.jpg" style=" width: 100%; padding: 20px 10px; />

API virtualization, on the other hand, is a ground-up attitude to mimicking system behaviors and does not assume that an entire environment is required in order to simulate realistic behavior, just what is necessary. Service virtualization itself is only a supportive task to building the actual system, and any time spent on it is time not spent on building or testing the actual system. Therefore, minimizing the amount of work and time it takes to configure virtual APIs improves both opportunity cost and minimizes unnecessary enterprise licensing costs.

In essence, service virtualization mimics an entire system, with all its complexity. When working with API virtualization, the only virtual asset is the API, which makes the virtualization itself a significantly easier process. Far fewer skills and much less knowledge about an enterprise service virtualization strategy is required for these teams to inherit the benefits of virtualizing one or more of their APIs.

Further Resources

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
I'm interested in...

Want to save time and money testing your APIs?

Try ServiceV

How to Succeed in an Increasingly Connected World

Read Now